Uber
Uber v Sefton
A booking for a private hire vehicle is not to be equated with a contract for the hire of that vehicle
Read MoreUber TfL Appeal
Uber Appeal. Transport for London sits on fence. Did not ask Judge to uphold its decision not to renew Uber’s licence.
Read MoreUber Wins Appeal
Uber has admitted its failings, apologised, and kept its London Licence. Judge says Uber is now fit and proper.
Read MoreUber: Plying for Hire
High Court says Uber driver not plying for hire – whether display on Uber App is equivalent of “for hire” sign.
Read MoreReading Decision in Full
Uber driver found not guilty of plying for hire. No decision on lawfulness of Uber app.
Read MoreUber driver: Plying for Hire
Uber driver acquitted of plying for hire – Court fails to address whether display on Uber App is equivalent of “for hire” sign.
Read MoreUber Licence Appeal
Uber Appeal Decision: Senior District Judge gives Uber a licence for a limited ‘probationary’ period of 15 months.
Read MoreCross Border Hiring
Cross border hiring is not always lawful. Operators who undermine local licensing control risk losing their licences.
Read More